Behavioral And Social Learning Approaches Personality Assessment

Personality stick out be specify as a hypothetical concept that constitute those relatively un spayable and enduring aspects of an individual which distinguishes them from other people making them unique, but which at the same prison term permit a comparison between individual. there ar various attackes that conceptualize mortalality. These ar the psychoanalytic perspective, the trait theory, doingsist ( scholarship) theory, compassionateistic theories cognitive and biological approaches. This paper however will look for the bearingal and amicable tuition theory approaches to temper.The focus will be in comparing and contrasting them and relating them to a personal reputation disorder. The kind learning theory is an approach that debates that we learn by imitation, modeling, and observation of other people behavior. If we unwrap a good behavior from other people, we are likely to behave well but if we observe bad behavior from them we behave badly. Albert Ba ndura is considered a major proponent of this theory. This approach similarly considers the environmental factors claiming they reinforce modeling.An individual can be reinforced directly by a model for example a student can fig up like other to fit in their group. A third person can also reinforce modeling. for example a teacher whitethorn praise a certain student making the others to model him. It is also possible to imitate the behavior itself. For example a student may play football during his leisure judgment of conviction influencing another to model the behavior. genial learning theory argues that reinforcement and penalty are necessary in learning. They deflect the level at which a person demonstrates a learnt behavior. They argue that moral discretion concerning the right or wrong is modeled.Bandura outlined from major condition for modeling to occur paying aid, remembering, ability to replicate, and motivation. Modeling leads to eruditeness of freshly behavior, affects the frequency of embarking a learner behavior, encourages a forbidden behavior and increases the frequency of a similar behavior. They emphasize of self regulation in personality development. For example setting own goals, self observation, self judgment and self reaction (Ormrod, J. E1999) The behavioral approach in personality judgment argues that personality can be acquired through observation.It put the environment responsible to personality difference among people. It assumes that we can understand other people by observing how they behave. It also argues that a response to certain stimuli molds behavior. Learning can occur though conditioning in both human and non human animals. It also assumes that all human are equal at birth. We are born a tabula rasa empty slit as we grow, the environmental factors molds our personality. Proponents of this approach include Skinners (1957) operant condition theory, Pavlov (1936) conditioning theory and Watson (1958). (Axialis T eam 2008)Both the social learning and behavioral theories emphasize on observation learning to personality acquisition. They consider environmental factors that influence our personality. They also consider reinforcement and punishment an important factor in learning. However, social learning theory argues that learning is possible without inescapably changing the behavior. This contrast the behavioral approach that argues that learning must be represented by a permanent dislodge in behavior. tender learning assumes people can learn through observation alone and which might not affect their performance therefrom may not or may impact behavior change.This contrasts the behavioral approach which assumes learning must involve a permanent change in behavior as well conditioning necessity in learning. Modeling, imitation and observation cannot be assumed in behavioral acquisition. environmental factors too are very important in personality assessment. These deuce approaches consider this. They both make a step to explain broader personality to include the animals. On the other hand, we cannot assume the thought processes, unobservable activities, biological and genetic factors in personality assessment and which they assume.Conditioning approach can be useful in explaining how we develop a tog how we model it, who influence us towards the habit and how we can stop the habit. In my early stages of life, I used to like toys very much. My upgrade would make sure that they bought me. Initially, my elderberry bush brother used to like them too. My parents would buy him every time he performed break away in school. He would spend time with them on his supernumerary time. He motivated my love for toys. When I started going to school, my parents adopted a similar strategy in buying me toys.It was not after I destroyed one like before, but after I performed better in school. I remember I had a hard time to adapt to this. Previously I mishandled them after all they would buy me if damaged. This time round, it was based on performance. I wasnt a good performing artist but I had to get going hard to get some new toys. If I didnt perform well, the punishment was no toy. As time went by, my performance deteriorated. My parents withdrew their reinforcement. At the long run, there were no more new toys. The old ones were not pleasant at all. I despised them. My performance currently is better but I hate toys.In the behavioral view, I observed the habit from my brother and learnt it, the environmental factors, my parent, influenced me to possess the habit of destroying them in order to be bought some new. I was reinforced to work harder to get new toys. The negative stimulus, the punishment, was not to be bought new toys. The aversive stimulus was my parents withdrawal of new toys when my performance decreased. I later stopped liking toys a result of the negative reinforcement. In the social learning view, I learnt the habit from observing my bro ther he used his free time well. My brother was my role model.I paid attention to his habit, I rehearsed and was able to replicate the way he handled and treated the toys. However, my parent motivated me by realizing my habit and therefore bought me some more toys. I did not permanently adapt the behavior implying that learning does not necessarily change behavior. Social learning approach best describes my personality I was able to observe, pay attention, rehearse and replicate my brothers behavior thus influencing my personality. I was able to regulate myself in settling my goals, observe and make my own judgment and choose my reaction from my parents move towards my habit.These theories explore the complexity of human nature. Whichever dimension they take as long as it explain personality assessment, is worth credential. However, if these approaches are unified they would have a better explanation to personality assessment. References Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning. Social learning theory Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice-Hall. Retrieved on Friday, October 31, 2008 from http//teachnet. edb. utexas. edu/lynda_abbott/Social. hypertext mark-up language Axialis team (2008) Psychologist World. Behavioral approach. Retrieved on Friday, October 31, 2008 from http//www. psychologistworld. com/issues/behavioralapproach. php